![]() The opinion delivers a long-sought victory for opponents of affirmative action in higher education who have argued for decades that taking race into consideration – even in a limited manner – thwarts the goal of achieving a color-blind society. ![]() During oral arguments, the right side of the bench appeared ready to rule against the schools. He said the programs involve racial stereotyping and had no specific end point. Roberts wrote the opinion for the conservative majority, saying the Harvard and University of North Carolina admissions programs violated the Equal Protection Clause because they failed to offer “measurable” objectives to justify the use of race. The landmark decision overturned long-standing precedent that has benefited Black and Latino students in higher education. The court on Thursday largely gutted affirmative action, saying colleges and universities can no longer take race into consideration as a specific basis for granting admission. They viewed the case through the lens of free speech and suggested that an artist or someone creating a customized product could not be forced by the government to express a message that violates her religious beliefs. The conservatives on the court were sympathetic at oral arguments to those put forward by Smith’s lawyer. The state and supporters of LGBTQ rights say that Smith is simply seeking a license to discriminate. Smith, whose company is called 303 Creative LLC, said that she is willing to work with all people, regardless of their sexual orientation, but she draws the line at creating websites that celebrate same-sex marriage because expressing such a message would be inconsistent with her beliefs. Under the law, a business may not refuse to serve individuals because of their sexual orientation. Smith has not yet moved forward with her new business venture because of Colorado’s public accommodations law. ![]() New documents show how Sandra Day O'Connor helped George W. In court, Chief Justice John Roberts, as well as some other conservatives, seemed deeply skeptical of the Biden administration’s plan.Ĭan businesses deny services to LGBTQ customers?Īt the center of another case is a graphic designer, Lorie Smith, who seeks to expand her business and create custom websites to celebrate weddings – but does not want to work with gay couples out of religious objections to same-sex marriage. They have moved to cut back on the so-called administrative state. Several of the conservative justices have signaled in recent years that agencies – with no direct accountability to the public – have become too powerful, upsetting the separation of powers. What will he do next on race?Īt the heart of the case is the Department of Education’s authority to forgive the loans. John Roberts upheld a key part of the Voting Rights Act. (Photo by Julia Nikhinson-Pool/Getty Images) Julia Nikhinson/Pool/Getty Images ![]() During his first State of the Union address, Biden spoke on his administration's efforts to lead a global response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, work to curb inflation, and bring the country out of the COVID-19 pandemic. WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 01: Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts is seen prior to President Biden giving his State of the Union address during a joint session of Congress at the U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |